| Interviews were recently conducted with CIRI Board-endorsed
candidates Karen Caindec, Gosta Dagg, Bart Garber, Bill Prosser,
and Clare Swan. Due to limited space, four responses from each candidate
were selected for publication. Comments have been edited for length.
We invite you to talk to candidates about these issues and their
statements. Or, use the phone card you recently received to call
a CIRI Board-endorsed candidate.
|
What is your vision for CIRI?
|
Caindec:
I envision CIRI as a strong, vibrant, economically sound Alaska
Native corporation that enriches and empowers the lives of its shareholders,
while remaining respectful of our unique heritage.
Garber:
CIRI will be a strong, successful, unified company of which shareholders
want to be a part, because it welcomes their participation and promotes
their financial independence and social well-being.
Dagg:
To succeed financially so we can continue – and hopefully
increase – economic, social, and cultural benefits to the
shareholders and their descendants.
|
Does CIRI do enough
for its youth? Elders?
|
Dagg:
Yes, but the future will require more. We will all be elders; our
Elders’ Settlement Trust, if voted in, will be irrevocable
and adequately funded. It will benefit all our elder original shareholders.
We face a challenge to our future youth, since our scholarship fund
is available to the descendants of original shareholders, an ever-increasing
number. To maintain our current level of assistance, we must have
growth in the parent company so increased dollars can be available
for the scholarship fund.
Swan:
Certainly, CIRI provides opportunities for education, training and
employment through The CIRI Foundation and non-profits. We are continually
looking for ways to preserve our heritage and it starts with taking
care of elders. That’s why the Elders’ Trust is so important.
|
Given the current
economic climate and CIRI’s diversified business portfolio,
what do you think the corporation’s priorities should be at this
time?
|
Caindec:
1. Protect the dividend stream from economic fluctuation. 2. Identify
income-producing investments that will contribute to our annual
net income. 3. Identify ways to lessen the tax burden for the corporation
and shareholders, now that CIRI is a tax-paying entity.
Dagg:
To invest in the areas of our strength, such as in the infrastructure
of Alaska natural resources, and inside and outside Alaska in areas
in which we can use our experience and our niche as a Native company.
Prosser:
Carefully preserve CIRI’s strength while laying a sound foundation
for future growth.
|
How
do you balance the need for long-term growth capital and shareholder dividends?
|
Caindec:
CIRI has experienced a once-in-a-lifetime gain from
the VoiceStream/DeutscheTelekom investment. It is up to the Board
and management to work together to identify investment goals for
these funds that will meet these two sometimes competing priorities
of growth capital and consistent distribution of shareholder dividends.
Through a closely managed, appropriately diversified investment
portfolio, we can work to meet both of these needs.
Swan:
By standing firm and holding fast to what our business
sense, and those who work for us, advise. We have to trust their
advice and refuse to be bullied into unwise short-term distributions.
Dagg:
The question contains the answer. We must indeed
balance growth against dividends. We are committed to continue dividends
primarily because the stock is not salable. To do this, we must
make sound investments. Shareholders must be educated to understand
this balance, and give their support to this sound business concept.
|
What
industry and/or economic sectors hold the most promise for CIRI in new
business development?
|
Garber:
CIRI has developed expertise and has found success, even in the
midst of boom and bust cycles, in real estate, energy-related industries,
and the financing of new technology. Over time, I believe that CIRI
will be able to find profitable niches in the tourism and gaming
industries.
Swan:
At the moment, the oil and gas industry looks promising; I am also
optimistic that our gaming business will be a sound, profitable
business.
Prosser:
CIRI is, and always has been, opportunistic. At the moment, the
best opportunities appear to me to be gaming and the Trans-Alaska
gas pipeline. The answer to this question changes constantly. Our
strength is in proactively opening new opportunities by good use
of our unique advantages.
|
There
has been some criticism about CIRI management compensation packages.
How do you respond to these concerns?
|
Garber:
Managers of large companies will probably always earn more than
the average person believes they should. What is important is to
clearly define what management is supposed to accomplish for the
company and the shareholders. If those goals are clearly stated
and measurable and real effort is required to achieve them, then
fair compensation packages can be negotiated and monitored.
Prosser:
All successful companies tie management compensation to performance.
Our company’s performance has been outstanding in the past
few years, in my judgment, and management’s salaries are at
appropriate levels. There is no reason to believe that lowering
current salaries would lead to performance exceeding the last few
years.
Caindec:
CIRI follows the philosophy of seeking to compensate its employees
at the mid-range of the pay scale for similar businesses. The executives
are compensated in line with this policy. I also agree with the
philosophy of “pay for performance.” Bonuses are commensurate
with CIRI’s success.
|
Is
there a solution for ending the in-fighting with the Alliance?
|
Garber:
Yes. We must get past issues of individual power and politics and
reexamine what shareholders want us to accomplish as a group. I
do not believe that CIRI’s only mission is to make money.
We need our shareholders to help reexamine and renew CIRI’s
mission. I think it is harder to define that mission now that the
battles with the federal government are over and we are left with
the task of managing ourselves. It is easier to fight one another
than to answer these questions: Who are we and what are we to do
with our company and ourselves?
Swan:
Yes. We just need to stop it. We weren’t elected to fight
with each other. We all know our charge as Directors – to
work together and guide CIRI to financial stability – so there
is simply no excuse for this behavior.
Prosser:
Our shareholder population is divided on the issue of how much of
the company’s assets should be used now (dividends) or used
for future growth (investment). The struggle between the Board majority
and the Alliance is a manifestation of this conflict, I believe.
|
|